Know what they’ll fund —
before you pitch.

Every preference we cite is traced to a real public statement — an interview, essay, podcast, or thread. We don't infer or generalize. Where public signal is thin, we flag low confidence explicitly rather than fill gaps. That said, this is not a guarantee of fit. Investor views evolve, and public statements don't capture everything. Treat the Blueprint as a strong starting point for preparation, not a prediction.

Only publicly available sources: written essays and investment theses, podcast and interview transcripts, conference talks, Twitter/X threads, and fund announcements. We never use leaked or private information. Every source used in your Blueprint is listed at the bottom of the report.

We'll tell you. If we can't find sufficient public signal, the Blueprint will note 'limited evidence' and mark dimensions as low-confidence rather than fabricate preferences. In cases of near-zero public footprint, we'll be upfront that the analysis is too thin to act on.

Crunchbase and PitchBook tell you who an investor has backed — portfolio companies, check sizes, stages. Fundlens tells you why they back what they back: their actual stated thesis, preferences, and filters, sourced from what they've said publicly. Different tool, different question.

A full Fundlens Blueprint for one investor: an overall fit score, six dimension scores with explanations, a hard constraint check, three specific first moves, a recommended business framing, and a downloadable PDF report — all cited to real public sources.

Yes. We don't publish searches, share them with third parties, or show them to other users. The investor name you enter is used solely to generate your Blueprint.